|
Radiology HomeDepartment OverviewFacultyResidencyFellowshipsNeuroradiologyRochester CommunityLinks |
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
Figure 1: 3D CT reconstruction in AP projection shows the asymmetric closure (arrow) of the right side of the coronal suture, with asymmetry of the skull. |
Figure 2: 3D CT reconstruction right lateral projection better depicts the closure premature closure (arrows) of the right side of the coronal suture. |
![]() |
|
Figure 3: Comparative Vertex view of 3D CT reconstruction (A) and CT-MIP (B) showing the abnormally premature right coronal suture (arrow). |
|
|
Figure
4: Rotational MIP demonstrating |
![]() |
Diagnosis: Craniosynostosis with premature closure of the right coronal suture.
Discussion:
Craniosynostosis results from premature
fusion of the sutures. It is thought that the premature closure of
the suture results in growth retardation of the skull, which secondarily
may lead to functional abnormalities of mentation, breathing, feeding
and vision. The majority of cranial synostosis involves a single
suture
and is non-syndromic [2].
Craniosynostosis represents a diversity of condition
which often requires early recognition in order to predict associated
complication and
insure preventive rather than symptomatic intervention. Cranial synostosis
has been classified as single versus multiple sutures synostosis.
The single suture synostosis involves the sagittal, coronal, lambdoid
or metopic suture. The multiple suture synostoses are more often
associated
with an underlying syndrome such as the Apert syndrome, Crouzon syndrome,
Pfeiffer syndrome, Saethre-Chotzen syndrome or Carpenter syndrome
[2].
Before the event of cross-sectional imaging, plain films were the
standard. In todays imaging CT is the standard for evaluating
craniosynostosis. Recent studies [1] have shown that both 3-D CT
and
MIP (maximal intensity projection) can better depict the patency
of skull sutures making it an important imaging tool to evaluate
the
extent of the synostosis and associated deformity and helps to plan
and determine the extent of surgery.
References:
|
|
||
©Copyright University of Rochester Medical Center, 1999-2006. Disclaimer. For questions or suggestions concerning the content of these pages, contact the URMC Webmaster.