|
Radiology HomeDepartment OverviewFacultyResidencyFellowshipsNeuroradiologyRochester CommunityLinks |
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Figures 1 & 2: Coronal IR images reveal lesion right of ethmoid cells leading to obstruction and mucocele formation in the frontal sinuses. |
|
Figure 3: Pre contrast T1- weighted image with fat suppression. |
Figure 4: T1-weighted fat suppressed image with contrast reveals enhancement in tumor and some enhancement in mucous secretions. |
Figure 5: Axial T2-weighted image again reveals lesion in right ethmoid air cells and increased mucous secretions in the frontal sinuses (not shown). |
|
Diagnosis: Ewing's sarcoma of the nasal cavity and sinuses with secondary mucocele
Discussion:
CLINICAL
DISCUSSION:
Epidemiology: Mucoceles are caused
by the accumulation of mucus due to occlusion of a draining sinus
ostium [1]. Mucoceles are responsible
for approximately 3% cases of nonendocrine exophthalmos and 4% of
orbital or sinus disease [[2].
Presentation: Patients often have a history of allergic rhinitis, sinusitis, or violent injury. Typical presentation may include headache or rhinomucorrhea. Ocular abnormalities such as exophthalmos, visual deficit, and disaxiation of eyeball may occur due to oculomotor nerve or muscle displacement [2].
Etiology: Mucoceles
result from the accumulation of impacted mucus behind an occlusion
of a sinus ostium; blockage may
be secondary
to trauma or neoplastic obstruction. Accumulation may also occur
as a result of increased mucous secretions of inflamed epithelium
in the sinuses [1,2].
Etiology/Pathology: Mucoceles are slow
growing, benign accumulations of mucus. Accumulation of mucous occurs
from most to least commonly
in the frontal, ethmoid, maxillary and sphenoid sinuses; posterior
fossa accumulations are less common. Mucocele may compress or
distend intracranial and or intraorbital structure. Skull erosion
may be
evident on radiographic studies [1,2].
Treatment
and Prognosis: Early detection of mucocele along
with surgical intervention is optimal to avoid irreversible neurological
damage.
Goals of surgery include evacuation of the lesion and removal
of sinus mucosa to prevent relapse. Post surgically, patients
experience
improvement in visual acuity and decreased exophthalmos [2].
NEUROIMAGING DISCUSSION:
Mucosal lining appears hypointense or isotense on T1 images
and moderately hyperintense on T2 images with variable thickness.
MRI findings within the mucocele are more
variable and depend on consistency of the accumulated mucus. Solid, inspissated
mucus secretions are hypointense on T1 images and even more so on T2 images.
This reflects a decrease in available hydrogen protons for the resonance
phenomenon, producing hypointense MR signal. CT reveals diffuse
hyperdensity within inspissated
mucus and no enhancement upon contrast injection. CT, then, is especially
useful in identifying dehydrated mucus accumulation; this may
appear as an aerated
sinus in MR images if there is no sinus enlargement. Mucus
with
liquid consistency
appears hyperintense on T1 and T2 images, reflecting high water and protein
content [1,3]. This hyperintensity on MR images is useful in
distinguishing fluid mucocele
from isotense neoplasms [4]. CT images of fluid mucus are hypointense [1].
Mucocele may produce ring enhancement on MR images with contrast.
[4]. Distension of sinus
walls or compression of adjacent neurovascular structures are other possible
findings in CT and MR images [2].
References:
|
|
||
| Previous Case | Next Case |
©Copyright University of Rochester Medical Center, 1999-2006. Disclaimer. For questions or suggestions concerning the content of these pages, contact the URMC Webmaster.