|
Radiology HomeDepartment OverviewFacultyResidencyFellowshipsNeuroradiologyRochester CommunityLinks |
|
|
|||||||||||||||
| Figure 1: Left frontal mucocele protruding into the orbit through the defect in the frontal sinus floor, causing mild proptosis. Note erosion in the posterior wall of the frontal sinus without penetration. |
Clinical Presentation - Patient 2: A 60-year-old male presented with headache and diplopia.
Radiological Findings - Patient 2: A contrast enhanced MRI demonstrates a ring-enhancing lesion arising from the left frontal sinus that has low-signal on T1, intermediate signal on T2, high-signal on diffusion weighted imaging, and low-signal on apparent diffusion coefficient mapping. The lesion measures 6.0x 3.2x4.0 cm. There is expansion of the lesion roof of the orbit causing anterior displacement of the left eye. It also exerts mass effect against anterior and posterior walls of the left frontal sinus with a large bony defects and displacement of the left frontal lobe posterior-superiorly.
| Figure 2: A ring-enhancing lesion arises from the left frontal sinus that has low-signal on T1, intermediate signal on T2, high-signal on diffusion weighted imaging. Note expansion through the roof of the orbit and posterior wall of the frontal sinus. |
Diagnosis: Frontal mucocele
Discussion: Mucocele
is an epithelial lined mucus-containing sac completely filling
a paranasal sinus and capable of expansion by virtue of a dynamic
process of bone resorption and new bone formation [1]. They are
benign lesions that occur with similar frequency in adults of both
sexes, 20 to 60 year-old [2].
An ostial obstruction caused by an inflammatory
scar, trauma, or tumor has been suggested as a pathogenesis of mucoceles. The
frontal sinuses are most commonly
affected, comprising up to 65% of all mucoceles. They are followed by ethmoid
sinus mucoceles, presenting in about 25% of cases, and maxillary in 10% [3].
Symptoms and signs of frontal mucoceles include
pain, swelling, exophthalmos, diplopia, and loss of vision. An erosive mucocele
may lead to meningitis, meningoencephalitis,
pneumocephalus, brain abscess, seizures or CSF fistulas [2].
On plain film examination, the density of a frontal
sinus mucocele is greater than that of an aerated sinus, but never greater than
that of the adjacent normal
frontal bone. If the sinus density is greater than the adjacent calvarium, a
fibro-osseous-type lesion rather than a mucocele should be considered [4].
CT demonstrates an airless, mucoid density (10–25
HU) filled, expansile, non-enhancing sinus mass with gradual thinning and erosion
of the bony margins.
Frontal sinus mucoceles tend to erode posterior wall because of its inherent
thinness. The density of sinus contents of a mucocele may be low or mixed relative
to that of muscle [3, 4].
MR exhibits variable signal intensities on both
T1- and T2-weighted images, depending on the state of hydration, protein content,
and viscosity of the contents of
the mucocele. The two most frequently observed patterns are (1) moderate-to-marked
high-signal intensity on both T1- and T2-weighted images, and (2) moderate-to-marked
low-signal intensity on both T1- and T2-weighted images. Contrast-enhanced
MR imaging is useful in differentiating mucoceles from sinonasal tumors. Mucoceles
characteristically reveal a thin peripheral linear enhancement with central low-signal
intensity on T1 weighted images. Sinonasal tumors, on the other hand, demonstrate
diffuse enhancement [3].
Differential diagnosis includes paranasal sinus carcinoma, Aspergillus infection,
chronic infection, inverting papilloma [5].
The most common treatment modality is radical extirpation of the mucocele, cranialization
of the sinus and nasofrontal duct obliteration using gelfoam, muscle graft and
fibrin glue through a transcranial access when the posterior wall of the frontal
sinus is eroded and the dura is involved. In the cases with infiltrated dura
and intradural invasion of the mucocele, resection of the involved dura and duraplasty
using pericranium or galea graft and fibrin glue is used. Vascularized local
flaps using pericranium or galea graft are highly effective in preventing contamination
of the anterior fossa. The residual defects of the anterior wall must be reconstructed
with autologous bone or alloplastic materials [2].
References:
|
|
||
| Previous Case | Next Case |
©Copyright University of Rochester Medical Center, 1999-2006. Disclaimer. For questions or suggestions concerning the content of these pages, contact the URMC Webmaster.