URochester Medicine / Labs / Maddox Lab / Publications

Recent Publications

1. Figarola V
2. Li Y
3. Tierney A
4. Dick F
5. Noyce A
6. Maddox RK
7. Shinn-Cunningham B
Attention to Pseudo-Tone Melodies Enhances Cortical but Not Brainstem Responses in Humans.; The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience. 2026 Apr 02.
1. Shan T
2. Lalor EC
3. Maddox RK
Chimeric music reveals an interaction of pitch and time in electrophysiological signatures of music encoding.; The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience. 2025 Dec 19.
1. Figarola V
2. Li Y
3. Tierney A
4. Dick F
5. Noyce A
6. Maddox RK
7. Shinn-Cunningham B
Attention to Psuedo-Tone Melodies Enhances Cortical but Not Brainstem Responses in Humans.; bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology. 2025 Dec 16.
1. Polonenko MJ
2. Maddox RK
The parallel auditory brainstem response paradigm provides accurate and fast hearing thresholds in a clinic-like setting.; medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences. 2025 Nov 30.
1. Polonenko MJ
2. Maddox RK
Bone conducted responses using the parallel auditory brainstem response (pABR) paradigm.; bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology. 2025 Oct 07.
1. Stoll TJ
2. Vandjelovic ND
3. Polonenko MJ
4. Li NRS
5. Lee AKC
6. Maddox RK
The auditory brainstem response to natural speech is not affected by selective attention.; PLoS biology; Vol 23(10), pp. e3003407. 2025 Oct 06.
1. Lau BK
2. Emmons K
3. Maddox RK
4. Estes A
5. Dager SR
6. Astley Hemingway SJ
7. Lee AKC
The relationship between intellectual ability and auditory multitalker speech perception in neurodivergent individuals.; PloS one; Vol 20(9), pp. e0329581. 2025 Sep 24.
1. Whiteford KL
2. Baltzell LS
3. Chiu M
4. Cooper JK
5. Faucher S
6. Goh PY
7. Hagedorn A
8. Irsik VC
9. Irvine A
10. Lim SJ
11. Mesik J
12. Mesquita B
13. Oakes B
14. Rajappa N
15. Roverud E
16. Schrlau AE
17. Van Hedger SC
18. Bharadwaj HM
19. Johnsrude IS
20. Kidd G
21. Luebke AE
22. Maddox RK
23. Marvin EW
24. Perrachione TK
25. Shinn-Cunningham BG
26. Oxenham AJ
Large-scale multi-site study shows no association between musical training and early auditory neural sound encoding.; Nature communications; Vol 16(1), pp. 7152. 2025 Aug 08.
1. Henry MJ
2. Obleser J
3. Crusey MR
4. Fuller ER
5. Lee YS
6. Meyer M
7. Acosta EAM
8. Van Hedger SC
9. Inbar M
10. Oderbolz C
11. Dunham SA
12. Anankul Y
13. Sabo LE
14. Keitel C
15. Maddox RK
16. Mehl K
17. Aslan G
18. Martens PA
19. Sauppe S
20. Horovitz M
21. Kinghorn EE
22. Koukouvinis S
23. Bosker HR
24. Huviyetli M
25. Leung C
26. Symons AE
27. Strauß A
28. Chait M
29. Hu M
30. Eulitz C
31. Salagovic CA
32. Davis C
33. Severijnen GGA
34. Kosachenko AI
35. Alain C
36. Kim J
37. Grahn JA
38. Sidhu RK
39. Megighian C
40. Butler BE
41. Sears DRW
42. Herrmann B
43. Griffiths ML
44. Landau AN
45. Razin R
46. Grassi M
47. Levitsky A
48. Holt LL
49. Belfi AM
50. Stewart HJ
51. Shinn-Cunningham BG
52. Gomez C
53. Brookes F
54. Smith ED
55. Axler E
56. Bakardjian K
57. Hochstrasser D
58. Guiotto Nai Fovino L
59. Tune S
60. Pavlov YG
61. Lee KA
62. Xavier AG
63. Keitel A
64. Rogers CS
65. Maltseva A
66. Strauss JL
67. Lodol FF
68. Arsiwala N
69. Peelle JE
How strong is the rhythm of perception? A registered replication of Hickok et al. (2015).; Royal Society open science; Vol 12(6), pp. 220497. 2025 Jun 11.
1. Shan T
2. Maddox RK
Comparing methods for deriving the auditory brainstem response to continuous speech in human listeners.; Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.); Vol 3. 2025 Jun 03.
1. Polonenko MJ
2. Maddox RK
The effect of speech masking on the human subcortical response to continuous speech.; eNeuro. 2025 Mar 24.
1. Fromm CA
2. Maddox RK
3. Polonenko MJ
4. Huxlin KR
5. Diaz GJ
Multisensory stimuli facilitate low-level perceptual learning on a diﬃcult global motion task in virtual reality.; PloS one; Vol 20(3), pp. e0319007. 2025 Mar 04.
1. Polonenko MJ
2. Maddox RK
The effect of speech masking on the human subcortical response to continuous speech.; bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology. 2024 Dec 11.
1. Polonenko MJ
2. Maddox RK
Fundamental frequency predominantly drives talker differences in auditory brainstem responses to continuous speech.; JASA express letters; Vol 4(11). 2024 Nov 01.
1. Dar IA
2. Khan IR
3. Johnson TW
4. Helmy SM
5. Cardona JI
6. Escobar S
7. Selioutski O
8. Marinescu MA
9. Zhang CT
10. Proctor AR
11. AbdAllah N
12. Busch DR
13. Maddox RK
14. Choe R
Wavelet and time-based cerebral autoregulation analysis using diffuse correlation spectroscopy on adults undergoing extracorporeal membrane oxygenation therapy.; PloS one; Vol 19(10), pp. e0299752. 2024 Oct 29.
1. Whiteford KL
2. Baltzell LS
3. Chiu M
4. Cooper JK
5. Faucher S
6. Goh PY
7. Hagedorn A
8. Irsik VC
9. Irvine A
10. Lim SJ
11. Mesik J
12. Mesquita B
13. Oakes B
14. Rajappa N
15. Roverud E
16. Schrlau AE
17. Van Hedger SC
18. Bharadwaj HM
19. Johnsrude IS
20. Kidd G
21. Luebke AE
22. Maddox RK
23. Marvin EW
24. Perrachione TK
25. Shinn-Cunningham BG
26. Oxenham AJ
Musical training does not enhance neural sound encoding at early stages of the auditory system: A large-scale multisite investigation.; bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology. 2024 Sep 04.
1. Stoll TJ
2. Maddox RK
Enhanced Place Specificity of the Parallel Auditory Brainstem Response: An Electrophysiological Study.; Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO. 2024 Aug 20.
1. Polonenko MJ
2. Maddox RK
Fundamental frequency predominantly drives talker differences in auditory brainstem responses to continuous speech.; bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology. 2024 Jul 13.
1. Stoll TJ
2. Maddox RK
Enhanced Place Specificity of the Parallel Auditory Brainstem Response: An Electrophysiology Study.; bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology. 2024 Mar 13.
1. Shan T
2. Cappelloni MS
3. Maddox RK
Subcortical responses to music and speech are alike while cortical responses diverge.; Scientific reports; Vol 14(1), pp. 789. 2024 Jan 08.
1. Khan IR
2. Dar IA
3. Johnson TW
4. Loose E
5. Xu YY
6. Santiago E
7. Donohue KL
8. Marinescu MA
9. Gosev I
10. Schifitto G
11. Maddox RK
12. Busch DR
13. Choe R
14. Selioutski O
Correlations Between Quantitative EEG Parameters and Cortical Blood Flow in Patients Undergoing Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation With and Without Encephalopathy.; Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society. 2023 Jan 30.
1. Stoll TJ
2. Maddox RK
Enhanced Place Specificity of the Parallel Auditory Brainstem Response: A Modeling Study.; Trends in hearing; Vol 27, pp. 23312165231205719. 2023.
1. Cappelloni MS
2. Mateo VS
3. Maddox RK
Performance in an Audiovisual Selective Attention Task Using Speech-Like Stimuli Depends on the Talker Identities, But Not Temporal Coherence.; Trends in hearing; Vol 27, pp. 23312165231207235. 2023.
1. Fiscella S
2. Cappelloni MS
3. Maddox RK
Independent mechanisms of temporal and linguistic cue correspondence benefiting audiovisual speech processing.; Attention, perception & psychophysics. 2022 Feb 24.
1. Johnson TW
2. Dar IA
3. Donohue KL
4. Xu YY
5. Santiago E
6. Selioutski O
7. Marinescu MA
8. Maddox RK
9. Wu TT
10. Schifitto G
11. Gosev I
12. Choe R
13. Khan IR
Cerebral Blood Flow Hemispheric Asymmetry in Comatose Adults Receiving Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation.; Frontiers in neuroscience; Vol 16. 2022.
1. Shan T
2. Wenner CE
3. Xu C
4. Duan Z
5. Maddox RK
Speech-In-Noise Comprehension is Improved When Viewing a Deep-Neural-Network-Generated Talking Face.; Trends in hearing; Vol 26, pp. 23312165221136934. 2022 Jan.
1. Fleming JT
2. Maddox RK
3. Shinn-Cunningham BG
Spatial alignment between faces and voices improves selective attention to audio-visual speech.; The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America; Vol 150(4). 2021 Oct.
1. Polonenko MJ
2. Maddox RK
Optimizing Parameters for Using the Parallel Auditory Brainstem Response to Quickly Estimate Hearing Thresholds.; Ear and hearing. 2021 Sep 28.
1. Polonenko MJ
2. Maddox RK
Exposing distinct subcortical components of the auditory brainstem response evoked by continuous naturalistic speech.; eLife; Vol 10. 2021 Feb 17.
1. Dar IA
2. Khan IR
3. Maddox RK
4. Selioutski O
5. Donohue KL
6. Marinescu MA
7. Prasad SM
8. Quazi NH
9. Donlon JS
10. Loose EA
11. Ramirez GA
12. Ren J
13. Majeski JB
14. Abramson K
15. Durduran T
16. Busch DR
17. Choe R
Towards detection of brain injury using multimodal non-invasive neuromonitoring in adults undergoing extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.; Biomedical optics express; Vol 11(11). 2020 Nov 01.
1. Lau BK
2. Maddox RK
3. Estes A
4. Dager S
5. Lee AKC
Combining clinical, behavioral, and neurophysiological measures to investigate auditory processing abnormalities in individuals with autism spectrum disorder.; Proceedings of meetings on acoustics. Acoustical Society of America; Vol 35(1). 2019 Jan 28.
1. Cappelloni MS
2. Shivkumar S
3. Haefner RM
4. Maddox RK
Task-uninformative visual stimuli improve auditory spatial discrimination in humans but not the ideal observer.; PloS one; Vol 14(9). 2019.
1. Polonenko MJ
2. Maddox RK
The Parallel Auditory Brainstem Response.; Trends in hearing; Vol 23. 2019 Jan.
1. Atilgan H
2. Town SM
3. Wood KC
4. Jones GP
5. Maddox RK
6. Lee AKC
7. Bizley JK
Integration of Visual Information in Auditory Cortex Promotes Auditory Scene Analysis through Multisensory Binding.; Neuron; Vol 97(3). 2018 Feb 07.
1. Maddox RK
2. Lee AKC
Auditory Brainstem Responses to Continuous Natural Speech in Human Listeners.; eNeuro; Vol 5(1). 2018 Jan.
1. Bizley JK
2. Maddox RK
3. Lee AK
Defining Auditory-Visual Objects: Behavioral Tests and Physiological Mechanisms.; Trends in neurosciences; Vol 39(2). 2016 Feb.
1. Maddox RK
2. Atilgan H
3. Bizley JK
4. Lee AK
Auditory selective attention is enhanced by a task-irrelevant temporally coherent visual stimulus in human listeners.; eLife; Vol 4. 2015.
1. Maddox RK
2. Pospisil DA
3. Stecker GC
4. Lee AK
Directing eye gaze enhances auditory spatial cue discrimination.; Current biology : CB; Vol 24(7). 2014 Mar 31.
1. Maddox RK
2. Sen K
3. Billimoria CP
Auditory forebrain neurons track temporal features of time-warped natural stimuli.; Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO; Vol 15(1). 2014 Feb.
1. Lee AK
2. Larson E
3. Maddox RK
4. Shinn-Cunningham BG
Using neuroimaging to understand the cortical mechanisms of auditory selective attention.; Hearing research; Vol 307. 2014 Jan.
1. Larson E
2. Maddox RK
3. Lee AK
Improving spatial localization in MEG inverse imaging by leveraging intersubject anatomical differences.; Frontiers in neuroscience; Vol 8. 2014.
1. Maddox RK
2. Cheung W
3. Lee AK
Selective attention in an overcrowded auditory scene: implications for auditory-based brain-computer interface design.; The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America; Vol 132(5). 2012 Nov.
1. Larson E
2. Maddox RK
3. Perrone BP
4. Sen K
5. Billimoria CP
Neuron-specific stimulus masking reveals interference in spike timing at the cortical level.; Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO; Vol 13(1). 2012 Feb.
1. Maddox RK
2. Shinn-Cunningham BG
Influence of task-relevant and task-irrelevant feature continuity on selective auditory attention.; Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO; Vol 13(1). 2012 Feb.
1. Maddox RK
2. Billimoria CP
3. Perrone BP
4. Shinn-Cunningham BG
5. Sen K
Competing sound sources reveal spatial effects in cortical processing.; PLoS biology; Vol 10(5). 2012.
1. Lee AK
2. Larson E
3. Maddox RK
Mapping cortical dynamics using simultaneous MEG/EEG and anatomically-constrained minimum-norm estimates: an auditory attention example.; Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE. 2012.
1. Kidd G
2. Streeter TM
3. Ihlefeld A
4. Maddox RK
5. Mason CR
The intelligibility of pointillistic speech.; The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America; Vol 126(6). 2009 Dec.
1. Billimoria CP
2. Kraus BJ
3. Narayan R
4. Maddox RK
5. Sen K
Invariance and sensitivity to intensity in neural discrimination of natural sounds.; The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience; Vol 28(25). 2008 Jun 18.